CaneTalk: and to add to what Chris said

and to add to what Chris said

Posted by BobbiStorm on 9/4/2009, 12:08 am

Avila asked for ship reports... and left open the door.

Think the lack of convection sealed the deal and as he said... idea is to track the low level center and yes i hear Jim's frustration when the planes are there and then they turn around and leave...

If I got all that right without misquoting anyone.

In this thread:

Yet another freaking new COC??? - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:14 pm

16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:28 pm
- Re: 16N62W (Erika) - Target, 9/3/2009, 10:41 pm
  - pathetic - BobbiStorm, 9/3/2009, 10:46 pm
    - Re: pathetic - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:13 pm
      - Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Target, 9/3/2009, 11:25 pm
        Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:04 am
        Re: Intellicast Loop Looks Consistent - Chris in Tampa, 9/3/2009, 11:50 pm
        and to add to what Chris said - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 12:08 am
        Re: and to add to what Chris said - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:27 am
        Radar shows center over Antigua - Target, 9/4/2009, 12:47 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:28 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 1:34 am
        prophetic blog - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:31 am
        Re: Radar shows center over Antigua - Jackstraw, 9/4/2009, 1:49 am
        Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Target, 9/4/2009, 2:04 am
        Re: Two LLC's at 5:57UTC, Sep 4th - Chris in Tampa, 9/4/2009, 3:30 am
        quickscat - jimw, 9/4/2009, 7:18 am
        Re: quickscat - BobbiStorm, 9/4/2009, 8:35 am
No center relocation - yet - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 8:53 pm
I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:16 pm
- Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - Storm Nut, 9/3/2009, 2:19 pm
  - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - lbccpt, 9/3/2009, 2:34 pm
    - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 2:58 pm
      - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - mdweather, 9/3/2009, 3:56 pm
        Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - hanna, 9/3/2009, 7:12 pm
      - Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - DTB_2009, 9/3/2009, 3:13 pm
        Re: I mean 16.5/61.7'ish N/T - jimw, 9/3/2009, 4:55 pm

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.