CaneTalk Forum | Search Messages | Post a New Message | Member Map
Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ...
Posted by LawKat on 8/31/2010, 4:52 pm
90
In this thread:
Posted by LawKat on 8/31/2010, 4:52 pm
| I think you're right. His optimal conditions ran out quicker than the NHC thought. Shear and dry air will likely not allow another peak as deep as 931. |
In this thread:
From a purely intensity standpoint ... - LawKat, 8/30/2010, 6:32 pm
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/31/2010, 3:13 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - LawKat, 8/31/2010, 4:52 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/31/2010, 5:30 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - Gianmarc, 8/30/2010, 7:34 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - BobbiStorm, 8/30/2010, 7:30 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - Anung Mwka, 8/30/2010, 6:52 pm
- Re: From a purely intensity standpoint ... - canetrakker, 8/30/2010, 6:40 pm
- his history at 5 PM - CypressTX, 8/30/2010, 6:57 pm
- Re: his history at 5 PM - BobbiStorm, 8/30/2010, 7:30 pm
- Re: his history at 5 PM - Chris in Tampa, 8/30/2010, 7:13 pm
- Re: his history at 5 PM - CypressTX, 8/30/2010, 7:26 pm
- Re: his history at 5 PM - HURRICANEHIRAM, 8/30/2010, 7:01 pm