CaneTalk Forum | Search Messages | Post a New Message | Member Map
Re: aren't "major" earthquakes classified as 7.0 and above? n/t
Posted by JAC on 3/3/2010, 9:04 pm
33
In this thread:
Posted by JAC on 3/3/2010, 9:04 pm
| It was a cut and paste from the headlines. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100304/ap_on_re_as/as_taiwan_earthquake_1 |
In this thread:
Mw 6.4 Taiwan - JAC, 3/3/2010, 7:37 pm
< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in- Strong Earthquake Measuring up to 6.6Mw Strikes Taiwan - JAC, 3/4/2010, 6:47 am
- Re: Strong Earthquake Measuring up to 6.6Mw Strikes Taiwan - JAC, 3/4/2010, 6:51 am
- Re: Mw 6.4 Taiwan - hillsboroughweather, 3/3/2010, 9:21 pm
- X-ray correlation? - JAC, 3/3/2010, 8:59 pm
- Also Magnetic Field - JAC, 3/3/2010, 9:03 pm
- Major earthquake hits Taiwan, no injuries reported - JAC, 3/3/2010, 8:52 pm
- aren't "major" earthquakes classified as 7.0 and above? n/t - CypressTX, 3/3/2010, 9:02 pm
- Re: aren't "major" earthquakes classified as 7.0 and above? n/t - JAC, 3/3/2010, 9:04 pm
- so then the "cut & paste" headline was incorrect, correct? - CypressTX, 3/3/2010, 9:13 pm
- because it appears the last time a "major" quake happened, worldwide, was before the "great" quake - CypressTX, 3/3/2010, 9:18 pm