CaneTalk: Re: 7.7 FEET AT TALCAHUANO

Re: 7.7 FEET AT TALCAHUANO

Posted by Chris in Tampa on 2/27/2010, 7:31 am

When they were talking to someone from the PTWC, he said that these were onshore, not open ocean heights. I forget what he said the open ocean reading were, I think in centimeters, and that translates when you get to shallower water and bays. So while this map doesn't seem so bad:
http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/chile/chileem.jpg
I think that might be open water. When it gets to shallower water it is a lot greater.

In this thread:

M 8.3 Santiago, Chile - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 2:12 am

7.7 FEET AT TALCAHUANO - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 5:10 am

Re: 7.7 FEET AT TALCAHUANO - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 7:25 am

Re: 7.7 FEET AT TALCAHUANO - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 7:31 am

There were several strong aftershocks much closer to the population centers - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 4:58 am

In 1960 Chile was hit by another major earthquake - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 4:29 am

Reporter said there were 6-7 meter waves in height coming ashore along the coast near Concepcion - chucky7777, 2/27/2010, 4:42 am

Hawaii does have an advisory - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 4:48 am

Re: Hawaii does have an advisory - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 4:56 am

CNN covering it live at times - Chris in Tampa, 2/27/2010, 4:08 am

Pacific tsunami warning info - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 2:31 am

Re: Pacific tsunami warning info - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 2:46 am

still not on Chilean Navy's site - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 2:50 am

Now is on Chilean Navy's site - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 9:32 am

Re: still not on Chilean Navy's site - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 3:03 am

update - tsunami was generated - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 2:55 am

upgraded to 8.8 - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 3:11 am

closest buoy - Station 32412 - CypressTX, 2/27/2010, 3:16 am

< Return to the front page of the: message board | monthly archive this page is in

Post A Reply

This thread has been archived and can no longer receive replies.